G.R.
No. L-46409 April 5, 1939
Insular
Motors Incorporated, petitioner
vs
City of Manila and Jose Garrido, City Engineer, respondents
Ponente:
Laurel
This
is an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus filed by the Insular Motor
Inc., against the respondents, the City of Manila and the city engineer, for
the purpose of compelling the latter official to grant a permit for the
construction of its proposed building on a parcel of land indicated in the
stipulation of facts.
As
stipulated, it appears that the Dominican father granted a lease option of a
parcel of land, lot No. 1-B-2, in Intramuros, Manila, to the petitioner which
thereupon submitted the plans of buildings which it proposed to erect of said
realty, to the city mayor and the city engineer with the request that the same
be approved and the corresponding permit issued. After some correspondence, the
application was denied due to the refusal of the petitioner to make a written
promise that it would comply with the provisions of the zonification ordinance
upon its final approval by the President of the Philippines.
Mandamus
issues only in cases where the petitioner has a clear legal right to the thing
demanded and where the law imposes the imperative duty upon the defendant to
perform the act desired. (Tabique vs. Duvall, 16 Phil., 324; and Ynchausti
Steamship Co. vs. Dexter and Unson, 41 Phil., 289.) In the instant case, the
petitioner has not clearly established his right to the building permit, nor
has he shown that the issuance of the same is an imperative duty imposed by law
upon the respondents or any one of them. On the contrary, we find that the
function of the city engineer of the City of Manila, so far as it relates to
the granting of permits, is discretionary which may not be controlled by
mandamus except in clear cases of grave abuse. (Felismino vs. Gloria, 47 Phil.,
967, and Guanio vs.Fernandez, 55 Phil., 814; Mechem, Law of Public Officers
[1890], pp. 631, 632.) The fact that the proposed zonification ordinance is
pending approval by the President of the Philippines, does not alter the
situation.
The
petition is hereby denied, with costs against the petitioner. So ordered.
No comments:
Post a Comment