G.R. No. 131457, August 19,
1999
Hon. Carlos Fortich
(Governor), Hon. Rey Baula (Mayor, Sumilao), NQSR Management and Development
Corp.
vs Hon. Renato C. Corona,
Deputy Exec. Sec., Hon. Ernesto Garilao, Sec. DAR
Ponente: Ynares-Santiago
Facts:
Respondents and intervenors
pray that this case be referred to SC En Banc. A careful reading however,
reveals the intention of the framers to draw a distinction between cases,
"decided" referring to cases and "resolved" referring to matters,
applying the rule of reddendo singula singulis. (referring each to each)
The issue presented by the
respondents is whether the power of the LGU to reclassify lands is subject to
the approval of the CAR is no longer novel, this having decided in Camarines
Sur vs CA case that the LGU need not obtain the approval of the DAR to convert
or reclassify lands from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
Intervenors insist that they
are real parties in interest inasmuch as they have already been issued
certificates of land ownership award, or CLOAs, and that while they are
seasonal farm workers at the plantation, they have been identified by the DAR
as qualified beneficiaries of the property.
Ruling:
Intervenors, who are
admittedly not regular but seasonal farm workers, have no legal or actual and
substantive interest over the subject land inasmuch as they have no right to
own the land. Rather, their right is limited only to a just share of the fruits
of the land.
No comments:
Post a Comment