G.R. No. 207851, July 8, 2014
Angel Naval
vs COMELEC and Nelson Julia
Facts:
Naval had served as member of the Sanggunian, 2nd
District of CamSur. On October 12, 2009, RA 9716 was approved, reapportioning
the legislative district of Province of CamSur.
Notably, 8 out of 10 towns were taken from the old
Second District to form the present Third District. The present Second District
is composed of the two remaining towns, Gainza and Milaor, merged with five
towns from the old First District.
In the 2010 elections, Naval once again won as among
the members of the Sanggunian, Third District. He served until 2013.
In the 2013 elections, Naval ran anewand was
re-elected as Member of the Sanggunian, Third District.
Julia was likewise a Sanggunian Member candidate
from the Third District in the 2013 elections. On October 29, 2012, he invoked
Section 7810 of the Omnibus Election Code (OEC) and filed before the COMELEC a
Verified Petition to Deny Due Course or to Cancel the Certificate of Candidacy
of Naval. Julia posited that Naval had fully served the entire Province of
Camarines Sur for three consecutive terms as a member of the Sanggunian,
irrespective of the district he had been elected from. The three-term limit
rule’s application is more with reference to the same local elective post, and
not necessarily in connection with an identical territorial jurisdiction.
Allowing Naval to run as a Sanggunian member for the fourth time is violative
of the inflexible three-term limit rule enshrined in the Constitution and the
LGC, which must be strictly construed.
COMELEC cancelled Naval's COC.
The conditions for the application of the three-term
limit rule are present in the instant case as the records clearly establish
that [Naval] is running for the 4th time for the same government post. To put
things in a proper perspective, it is imperative to review and discuss the
salient points in the case of Latasa v. [COMELEC]. The case involves the
question of whether or not a municipal mayor, having been elected and had
already served for three (3) consecutive terms, canrun as city mayor in light
of the conversion of the municipality to a city. In applying the three-term
limit rule, the Court pointed out that the conversion of the municipality into
a city did not convert the office of the municipal mayor into a local government
post different from the office of the city mayor. The Court took into account
the following circumstances: (1) That the territorial jurisdiction of [the]
city was the same as that of the municipality; (2) That the inhabitants were
the same group of voters who elected the municipal mayor for three (3)
consecutive terms; and (3) That the inhabitants were the same group of voters
[over] whom he held power and authority as their chief executive for nine
years.
Ruling:
Court denies the petition.
A republic is a representative government, a
government run by and for the people. It is not a pure democracy where the
people govern themselves directly. The essence of republicanism is
representation and renovation, the selection by the citizenry of a corps of
public functionaries who derive their mandate from the people and act on their
behalf, serving for a limited period only, after which they are replaced or
retained, at the option of their principal.
R.A.No. 9716 plainly state that the new Second
Districtis to be created, but the Third Districtis to be renamed. Verba legis
non est recedendum. The terms used in a legal provision to be construed compels
acceptance and negates the power of the courts to alter it, based on the
postulate that the framers mean what they say.
The rationale behind reapportionment is the
constitutional requirement to achieve equality of representation among the
districts. It is with this mindset that the Court should consider Naval’s
argument anent having a new set of constituents electing him into office in
2010 and 2013.
Naval’s ineligibility to run, by reason of violation
of the three-term limit rule, does not undermine the right to equal
representation of any of the districts in Camarines Sur. With or without him,
the renamed Third District, which he labels as a new set of constituents, would
still be represented, albeit by another eligible person.
No comments:
Post a Comment