G.R. No. 183546, September
18, 2009
Wilson Go
vs Harry GO
Ponente: Ynares-Santiago
Facts:
Wilson instituted an action
for partition with accounting against Harry Go in RTC Valenzuela City. Wilson
alleged that they are among the five children of Spouse Sio Tong Go and they
are the registered owner of a parcel of land in Valenzuela City. On the said
land, there are 7 warehouses being rented by various businesses without proper
authority from Wilson. He also alleges that Harry collected the rental payments
for the warehouse without giving Wilson his share to the rental.
Harry countered that there
was no co-ownership because he acquired the ownership of the land through
extra-judicial settlement between their father and certain Wendell Simsim. That
before a partition may be decided, it must be ascertain first whether there is
co-ownership.
RTC: ruled in favor of
Wilson and ordered Harry to deposit in court the receipt of all the amounts collected
by him from the leases. Harry moved for reconsideration but was denied by the
RTC. Harry filed then a petition for certiorari with CA.
CA: ruled in favor of Harry.
It was premature for the
respondent court to act favorable on private respondent's motion to deposit in
court all rentals collected from the date of death of the said decedent, which
according to petitioner is the true owner of the property under co-ownership.
Held:
The Court emphasizes that
these are preliminary findings for the sole purpose of resolving the propriety
of the subject order requiring the deposit of the monthly rentals with the
trial court. The precise extent of the
interest of the parties in the subject land will have to await the final
determination by the trial court of the main action for partition after a trial
on the merits.
WHEREFORE, the petition is
PARTIALLY GRANTED. The April 21, 2008
Decision and July 4, 2008 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.
100100 are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The
May 4 and July 4, 2007 Orders of the Regional Trial Court of Valenzuela City,
Branch 172 in Civil Case No. 179-V-06 are SET ASIDE and a new Order is entered
directing private respondent to deposit 1/12 of the monthly rentals collected
by him from the buildings on TCT No. V-44555 with the trial court from the
finality of this Decision and every month thereafter until it is finally
adjudged who is lawfully entitled thereto.
No comments:
Post a Comment